Methods of Ions Generation in Mass Spectrometry
Methods of Ions Generation in Mass Spectrometry
Almost all compounds that we want to identify using mass spectrometric techniques are not charged. Moreover, analytes are usually present in liquid, solid, or gas phases at atmospheric pressure while mass spectrometers operate under high vacuum. Thus, we have to choose such sample introduction and ionization technique which preserves an analyte from decomposition during its transfer from a common environment (condensed or gas phase) to an ion source. The sample, which is initially at atmospheric pressure (~760 Torr) must be introduced into the instrument in such a way that the vacuum inside the instrument remains relatively unchanged (from ~10-5 up to ~10-11 torr in ICR and Orbitrap mass analyzers). The most common methods of sample introduction are direct infusion or LC injection into an atmospheric pressure ionization ion source such as ESI or APCI, sample introduction via capillary GC, and direct insertion with a probe or plate (the last is used with MALDI MS).
Recommended Literature
Marvin L. Vestal, Methods of Ion Generation, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 361.
Burnaby Munson, Development of Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Int. J. of Mass Spectr., 2000, 200, 243.
M.S.B. Munson and F.H. Field, Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry. I. General Introduction, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88, 12, 2621.
Barbara L. Jelus, Roger K. Murray, Burnaby Munson, Studies in Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Secondary Alcohols with Isobutane, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 9, 2362.
M. Vairamani, U.A Mirza, R. Srinivas, Unusual Positive Ion Reagents in Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Mass Spectr. Rev., 1990, 9, 235.
M.S.B. Munson and F.H. Field, Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry. II. Esters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88, 9, 4337.
D.F. Hunt, G.C. Stafford, Jr.F.W. Crow, J.W. Russell, Pulsed Positive Negative Ion Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 1976, 48, 14, 2098.
S.J. Gaskel, Electrospray: Principles and Practice, J. Mass Spectrom., 1997, 32, 677.
R.B. Cole, Some tenets pertaining to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, J. Mass Spectrom., 2000, 35, 763.
N.B. Cech, Ch. G. Enke, Practical Implications of Some Recent Studies in Electrospray Ionization Fundamentals, Mass Spectr. Rev., 2001, 20, 362.
J.B. Fenn, J. Rosell, Ch. Kai Meng, In Electrospray Ionization, How Much Pull Does an Ion Need to Escape Its Droplet Prison?, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 1997, 8, 1147.
J.B. Fenn, Ion Formation from Charged Droplets: Roles of Geometry, Energy, and Time, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 1993, 4, 524.
P. Kebarle, A brief overview of the present status of the mechanisms involved in electrospray mass spectrometry, J. Mass Spectrom., 2000, 35, 804.
M. Karas, M. Gluckmann, J. Schafer, Ionization in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization: singly charged molecular ions are the lucky survivors, J. Mass Spectrom., 2000, 35, 1.
F. Hillenkamp, M. Karas, Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, an experience, Int. J. Mass Spectr., 2000, 200, 71.
R. Zenobi, R. Knochenmuss, Ion Formation in MALDI Mass Spectrometry, Mass Spectr. Rev., 1998, 17, 337.
D.F. Hunt, G.C. Stafford, Jr.F.W. Crow, J.W. Russell, Pulsed Positive Negative Ion Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 1976, 48, 14, 2098.
P. Kebarle, U.H. Verkerk, Electrospray: From Ions in Solution to Ions in the Gas Phase, What We Know Now, Mass Spectr. Rev., 2009, 6, 898.T.R. Covey, B.A. Thomson, B.B Schneider, Atmospheric Pressure Ion Sources, Mass Spectr. Rev., 2009, 6, 870.